| View previous topic | View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Aedryan Methyus
Prestigious Innovator Of Ghost Study
Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 952
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
 Posted: Aug Thu 10, 2006 1:32 pm Post subject: TAPS Is Being Debunked! |
 |
|
I found this blog on MySpace that I wanted to share with you guys. I'm glad to see someone is finally exposing these clowns!
TAPS Being Debunked!
- Aedryan
_________________
 |
|
|
... |
|
 Back to top |
fratka
Prestigious Innovator Of Ghost Study
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Location: Alvin, TX
|
| Posted: Aug Thu 10, 2006 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am, by no means a fan of TAPS but I am even less of a fan of skeptics! I don't buy into any of this guys attempts at debunking or anyone elses. If I spent my energy trying to recreate anomalous activity, I could probably mimic most of what a spirit typically does in a haunted house. Hell, Hollywood does it all the time.
Do I think all of TAPS televised investigations are legitimate...Hell No! To be able to shoot this stuff for an entire season and get consistent results in any investigative environment is a fleeting thought at the very least. As for their scientific approach...please! When you have any kind of medium or demonologist on staff it is impossible to have a scientific investigation. Your information will always be skewed with feelings and impressions.
At least that is what I think! 
_________________
Frank Ratka
Death does not exist!
http://thecontactfield.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
Aedryan Methyus
Prestigious Innovator Of Ghost Study
Joined: 16 Mar 2006
Posts: 952
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Aug Fri 11, 2006 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've gotta say, they did a great job of recreating the cloaked figure running towards the camera. Add some snow and it would be identical! Why were TAPS - The almighty ghost hunting authorities, shooting video outside while it was snowing anyway?
- Aedryan
_________________
|
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
fratka
Prestigious Innovator Of Ghost Study
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 567
Location: Alvin, TX
|
| Posted: Aug Fri 11, 2006 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, they did a good job. I just don't like skeptics and too many investigators use that term to loosely. Skeptics, as you see in the bloggers writing are snide and condescending. They try to make fools out of someone instead up providing an objective and critical point of view. Instead of being constructive they are destructive.
What investigators need to say is that they have an objective point of view with a realistic outlook on their collected evidence. In other words they see the evidence for what it is, without embelishment.
_________________
Frank Ratka
Death does not exist!
http://thecontactfield.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
... |
|
| Back to top |
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
